Archived article
Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.
Burford Capital’s $16 billion court win is not a done deal

AJ Bell is an easy to use, award-winning platform Open an account
We've accounts to suit every investing need, and free guides and special offers to help you get the most from them.
You can get a few handy suggestions, or even get our experts to do the hard work for you – by picking one of our simple investment ideas.
All the resources you need to choose your shares, from market data to the latest investment news and analysis.
Funds offer an easier way to build your portfolio – we’ve got everything you need to choose the right one.
Starting to save for a pension, approaching retirement, or after an explainer on pension jargon? We can help.
Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.
On 8 September, investors in litigation finance provider Burford Capital (BUR:AIM) were treated to a 22% spike in the share price to a four-year high of £13.43 following a landmark US ruling on its largest case.
For the past eight years Burford has been pursuing a legal case against Argentina for damages on behalf of several plaintiffs after their shares in YPF, the former state-owned oil producer, were renationalised in 2012.
The US District Court for the Southern District of New York judged that by law the Argentine government should have tendered for YPF shares in April 2012, rather than requisitioning them, and that as well as repaying the capital it should pay interest at a simple rate of 8%, which in round numbers makes the judgement worth $16 billion.
Burford described the ruling as ‘a complete win against Argentina at the high end of the possible range of damages’.
While Burford didn’t quantify what the decision means in terms of its own income, analyst Julian Roberts at Jefferies estimates the firm is entitled to around $6.3 billion or $28.77 per share compared with a share price of around $16.05 for the US-listed version of the shares as of 11 September.
However, Burford has warned shareholders this isn’t the end of the issue as the Argentine government has already signalled it will appeal the decision, meaning the plaintiffs will either have to reach a negotiated settlement – which could be for a lot less than $16 billion – or they may have to engage in a lengthy ‘enforcement campaign’ and further legal proceedings.
These articles are provided by Shares magazine which is published by AJ Bell Media, a part of AJ Bell. Shares is not written by AJ Bell.
Shares is provided for your general information and use and is not a personal recommendation to invest. It is not intended to be relied upon by you in making or not making any investment decisions. The investments referred to in these articles will not be suitable for all investors. If in doubt please seek appropriate independent financial advice.
Investors acting on the information in these articles do so at their own risk and AJ Bell Media and its staff do not accept liability for losses suffered by investors as a result of their investment decisions.
The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you originally invested. We don't offer advice, so it's important you understand the risks, if you're unsure please consult a suitably qualified financial adviser. Tax treatment depends on your individual circumstances and rules may change. Past performance is not a guide to future performance and some investments need to be held for the long term.
Our website uses cookies to give you a better browsing experience.
You can choose to accept all cookies, or control which we use by clicking 'Manage cookies'. To learn more, read our cookie policy.