When a presidential social media post is capable of sending stock, bond, currency and commodity markets spinning, up or down, there is a danger that any article, podcast or comment has a limited shelf life. Even this is of value in some ways, as it makes it clear that no-one – but not one – knows what is coming next.

It may, therefore, be worth bearing in mind legendary investor Warren Buffett’s observation that: ‘The job of the stock markets is to take money from the impatient and give it to the patient.’ Long-term investors’ may therefore wish to step back from the day-to-day noise and assess the three of the possible scenarios that may develop in the wake of president Trump’s decision to pause reciprocal tariffs for ninety days but stick with the 10% baseline levies and continue to slap extra duties on imported Chinese goods.

One is that the White House continues to change its mind, and new policies emerge before the ninety days are up, with the possible result that the world stops taking America’s word on trust (perhaps rather as it did the UK’s as it wrestled with how to implement Brexit). Volatility predominates and the president does what he wants until the stock or bond market tells him otherwise.

Another is that the world just goes back to where it was before and American exceptionalism continues to carry all before it, politically and economically and also in stock market terms.

And another is that the world was already looking different before president Trump launched tariffs – the S&P 500 had already rolled over, confronted by weighty Federal debts and uncomfortable annual deficits, the Department of Government Efficiency’s version of austerity, DeepSeek’s challenge to the AI narrative and, ultimately, lofty valuations which left little margin for error should anything untoward happen (which it just might have).

Investors have to decide for themselves which, if any of these, scenarios are most likely to occur and which offers the best balance between risk and reward when it comes to portfolio construction and any weightings toward US assets, and American equities in particular.

ATLANTIC CROSSING

The ultimate guide to the risk-reward equation in each instance is valuation. In this context, the travails of the US equity market seem a little easier to understand, as does the relative resilience of the UK market. Granted, investors cannot pay bills with relative outperformance when markets are falling, but investing is about getting from one side of the volatility to the next and being ready to benefit from the next upward leg in securities prices. This, again, requires appropriate calibration of risk and valuation can be a good guide as to how to garner downside protection and leave room for upside once the better times roll.

The US has been flying high for some time, the UK has not, and this has manifested itself I the valuations afforded each nation’s headline index, the S&P 500 and the FTSE 100, respectively.

As a result of that, the US trades on a price/earnings premium of more than eleven points, compared to a post-1987 average of less than seven (and a premium of less than four points in the run up to 2016’s Brexit vote).

In addition, analysts’ consensus profits forecasts assume 14% earnings growth from the S&P 500 in each of 2025 and 2026. By contrast, FTSE 100 aggregate earnings are seen coming in flat in 2025, before a 13% recovery in 2026, after three fallow years.

None of this guarantees outperformance from the UK relative to the US, but it does suggest it may not as much to turn the tables as many think, given how valuations and expectations are so much lower for the former than they are for the latter.

WANDERLUST

Those investors who think that a major change in the market temperature is in the offing may be inclined to think bigger still. If president Trump and treasury secretary Bessent are really serious in their hints about resetting the global trade and monetary systems as we know them (a trick last pulled by president Richard M. Nixon in 1971) then a reassessment of debt and fiat currency valuations could favour hard assets like commodities, which thrived in the 1970s.

Raw materials generate no cash so they are hard to value, and all investors can really use to judge their downside risk is the incremental cost of production. They may be a bit off the beaten track, but it does look like commodities are trading at very low levels relative to equities and it was Investment Biker author Jim Rogers who once noted that: ‘Nearly every time I have strayed from the herd, I have made a lot of money. Wandering away from the action is the way to find the new action.’

‹ Previous2025-04-17Next ›