Archived article
Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.
Pressure on corporate brokers implies potential wave of M&A

AJ Bell is an easy to use, award-winning platform Open an account
We've accounts to suit every investing need, and free guides and special offers to help you get the most from them.
You can get a few handy suggestions, or even get our experts to do the hard work for you – by picking one of our simple investment ideas.
All the resources you need to choose your shares, from market data to the latest investment news and analysis.
Funds offer an easier way to build your portfolio – we’ve got everything you need to choose the right one.
Starting to save for a pension, approaching retirement, or after an explainer on pension jargon? We can help.
Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.
Many stock market-listed corporate brokers are under pressure thanks to new regulation called MiFID II which is affecting demand for their equity research.
Before the new regime, brokers could pack their company research into the whole offering they provide to what’s called the ‘buy side’, typically represented by asset managers. Now brokers must ‘unbundle’ this research and charge clients separately for it.
This may not be a problem for some of the large investment banks as they have multiple revenue streams. For smaller brokerages such as Arden Partners (ARDN:AIM), the impact seems apparent in its results. It suffered a £2.3m pre-tax loss for the six months to 30 April 2018 and its share price has declined by 27% year-to-date.
Not all brokers are struggling. Numis (NUM:AIM) grew pre-tax profit by 86% to £19.5m in the six months to 31 March 2018 and its share price has increased by 22% year-to-date.
Data from fintech firm ITG shows commissions paid to brokerages in the first quarter of 2018 fell by 28% on a year-on-year basis.
An article in the Financial Times suggested the brokerage industry may consolidate in response to the changing landscape.
The article flagged that brokers had been struggling prior to the introduction of MiFID II due to falling commissions and a ‘tepid initial public offering market’ citing Brexit and market volatility as underlying causes.
Another reason that brokers may not be winning as much business is a change of focus by asset managers. This sector is also under pressure due to the growing prevalence of cheaper passive investment funds such as exchange-traded funds.
As pricing pressures eat into the fees that fund managers can charge, it means they are going to be highly selective of the research they buy. (DS)
These articles are provided by Shares magazine which is published by AJ Bell Media, a part of AJ Bell. Shares is not written by AJ Bell.
Shares is provided for your general information and use and is not a personal recommendation to invest. It is not intended to be relied upon by you in making or not making any investment decisions. The investments referred to in these articles will not be suitable for all investors. If in doubt please seek appropriate independent financial advice.
Investors acting on the information in these articles do so at their own risk and AJ Bell Media and its staff do not accept liability for losses suffered by investors as a result of their investment decisions.
The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you originally invested. We don't offer advice, so it's important you understand the risks, if you're unsure please consult a suitably qualified financial adviser. Tax treatment depends on your individual circumstances and rules may change. Past performance is not a guide to future performance and some investments need to be held for the long term.