Archived article
Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.
Is Restaurant Group paying too much for Wagamama?

AJ Bell is an easy to use, award-winning platform Open an account
We've accounts to suit every investing need, and free guides and special offers to help you get the most from them.
You can get a few handy suggestions, or even get our experts to do the hard work for you – by picking one of our simple investment ideas.
All the resources you need to choose your shares, from market data to the latest investment news and analysis.
Funds offer an easier way to build your portfolio – we’ve got everything you need to choose the right one.
Starting to save for a pension, approaching retirement, or after an explainer on pension jargon? We can help.
Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.
Shares in Frankie & Benny’s operator Restaurant Group (RTN) fell nearly 14% on 30 October amid concerns it is overpaying for the acquisition of Asian fusion chain Wagamama, plus dilution relating to a rights issue to help fund the deal.
The £559m price equates to 13.3 times EV/EBITDA (enterprise value to earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation), far higher than one would expect from a casual dining business.
The deal price drops to 8.7 times EV/EBITDA once you include cost and site conversion synergies, says broker Canaccord Genuity.
Wagamama has ‘significantly outperformed’ the core UK market and benefits from demand for its healthy dishes, speed of service and delivery, argues Restaurant Group.
Shareholders need to question whether the transformational deal is the right move, given the difficult environment for casual dining restaurants.
Investment bank Citi is cautious about future growth at Wagamama, which delivered an average of 9.6% like-for-like growth over the last four years, but limited profit growth.
Broker Peel Hunt is also concerned, saying Restaurant Group will have additional debt obligations. It notes that current trading from the acquirer’s existing estate has experienced a slowdown in like-for-like sales growth at 1.4% for the past 14 weeks versus 2.4% gain in the first six weeks of this period.
Like-for-like sales are now down 2.2% year-to-date, which is behind market expectations. (LMJ)
These articles are provided by Shares magazine which is published by AJ Bell Media, a part of AJ Bell. Shares is not written by AJ Bell.
Shares is provided for your general information and use and is not a personal recommendation to invest. It is not intended to be relied upon by you in making or not making any investment decisions. The investments referred to in these articles will not be suitable for all investors. If in doubt please seek appropriate independent financial advice.
Investors acting on the information in these articles do so at their own risk and AJ Bell Media and its staff do not accept liability for losses suffered by investors as a result of their investment decisions.
The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you originally invested. We don't offer advice, so it's important you understand the risks, if you're unsure please consult a suitably qualified financial adviser. Tax treatment depends on your individual circumstances and rules may change. Past performance is not a guide to future performance and some investments need to be held for the long term.