Archived article
Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.
Shareholder dissent remains muted

AJ Bell is an easy to use, award-winning platform Open an account
We've accounts to suit every investing need, and free guides and special offers to help you get the most from them.
You can get a few handy suggestions, or even get our experts to do the hard work for you – by picking one of our simple investment ideas.
All the resources you need to choose your shares, from market data to the latest investment news and analysis.
Funds offer an easier way to build your portfolio – we’ve got everything you need to choose the right one.
Starting to save for a pension, approaching retirement, or after an explainer on pension jargon? We can help.
Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.
Given some high profile corporate disasters of late, including the likes of Carillion, Patisserie Valerie and Thomas Cook, you might have expected shareholders to be champing at the bit to hold companies to account.
However, data from Minerva Analytics 2019 UK Voting Review shows shareholder dissent or the proportion voting against resolutions at FTSE 350 firms’ AGMs remains pretty modest and below where it was a decade ago at 2.95%.
Beneath this headline number there are signs that investors are ‘picking their battles’, showing significant dissent in some high profile examples.
Still the number of resolutions which received dissent of 20% or more according to Minerva only totalled 126 during this most recent AGM season compared with 148 in 2018. The appointment of directors and executive pay remained the hottest issues. Board resolutions accounted for 41.3% of all high dissent resolutions and remuneration for 32.5%.
Minerva includes abstentions when recording dissent on the basis that this represents showing a ‘yellow card’ to management.
Interestingly the report shows that nearly 50% of the companies which have received dissent of 20% or more are repeat offenders having also received high levels of dissent in 2018.
These articles are provided by Shares magazine which is published by AJ Bell Media, a part of AJ Bell. Shares is not written by AJ Bell.
Shares is provided for your general information and use and is not a personal recommendation to invest. It is not intended to be relied upon by you in making or not making any investment decisions. The investments referred to in these articles will not be suitable for all investors. If in doubt please seek appropriate independent financial advice.
Investors acting on the information in these articles do so at their own risk and AJ Bell Media and its staff do not accept liability for losses suffered by investors as a result of their investment decisions.
The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you originally invested. We don't offer advice, so it's important you understand the risks, if you're unsure please consult a suitably qualified financial adviser. Tax treatment depends on your individual circumstances and rules may change. Past performance is not a guide to future performance and some investments need to be held for the long term.