Archived article
Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.
Analysts say Greencoat Renewables cannot justify premium rating

AJ Bell is an easy to use, award-winning platform Open an account
We've accounts to suit every investing need, and free guides and special offers to help you get the most from them.
You can get a few handy suggestions, or even get our experts to do the hard work for you – by picking one of our simple investment ideas.
All the resources you need to choose your shares, from market data to the latest investment news and analysis.
Funds offer an easier way to build your portfolio – we’ve got everything you need to choose the right one.
Starting to save for a pension, approaching retirement, or after an explainer on pension jargon? We can help.
Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.
Dividend hungry investors should not pay any price for income as it could result in a capital loss, warn analysts at Stifel as they downgrade the popular Greencoat Renewables (GRP) investment trust to a negative rating.
Renewable funds have been in high demand for years due to their generous dividends and environmental friendliness, meaning they often trade at double-digit premiums to their net asset value (NAV).
Greencoat Renewables is no different with its 4.9% dividend yield, but Stifel says its current premium of 21% is a price not worth paying given it offers ‘little or no NAV growth and marginal dividend growth’.
Stifel says the fund is a ‘prodigious issuer of capital’ and believes investors would be better served by exiting now and biding their time until its next capital raise or share price setback.
They point out the current premium is equivalent to over three years of dividends (or two years if compared to the last share issuance price), ‘giving an exiting investor plenty of time to wait for a more attractive entry point’. Stifel also notes the last capital raise in December was done at a price 10% below the current share price.
Meanwhile a lot of bad news is coming out of the sector which also makes it less attractive from an investment perspective.
Stifel said in April it thought many funds would be vulnerable to revenue shortfalls and reduced dividend cover when they come to renew price agreements, unless there is a substantial recovery in power prices which fell during the coronavirus pandemic.
These articles are provided by Shares magazine which is published by AJ Bell Media, a part of AJ Bell. Shares is not written by AJ Bell.
Shares is provided for your general information and use and is not a personal recommendation to invest. It is not intended to be relied upon by you in making or not making any investment decisions. The investments referred to in these articles will not be suitable for all investors. If in doubt please seek appropriate independent financial advice.
Investors acting on the information in these articles do so at their own risk and AJ Bell Media and its staff do not accept liability for losses suffered by investors as a result of their investment decisions.
The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you originally invested. We don't offer advice, so it's important you understand the risks, if you're unsure please consult a suitably qualified financial adviser. Tax treatment depends on your individual circumstances and rules may change. Past performance is not a guide to future performance and some investments need to be held for the long term.