Archived article
Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.
What can I do if I’m forced to wait for the state pension?

I’ve just turned 60 and was expecting to receive my state pension at age 67. I’m now worried that the Government is going to change the timetable and leave me high and dry. Is there anything I can do?
Colin
Tom Selby, AJ Bell Head of Retirement Policy, says:
While there are stories about the Government potentially accelerating a planned increase in the state pension age to 68, nothing has been formally announced. Secondly, based on previous statements it is unlikely any change in the timetable would impact your state pension age.
The current UK state pension age is 66. Those who build up an entitlement to the full flat-rate state pension receive £185.15 per week, or just shy of £10,000 a year. Because this new system was only introduced in 2016 and your entitlement is based on several factors including your National Insurance record, it is possible you will receive more or less than this amount.
Plans set out by previous Governments mean the state pension age will increase to 67 between 2026 and 2028, and it is expected to then rise again to 68 between 2044 and 2046. During those two-year transition periods, some people would have a state pension age between 66 and 67, and 67 and 68.
A review of the state pension age is ongoing and there are rumours the proposed increase to age 68 could be brought forward to the 2030s.
While this would likely impact millions of people’s retirement plans, the Government has previously said any shift in the state pension age timetable would give people at least a decade of notice. As you are within seven years of your state pension age, you should not be affected – although it’s worth keeping track just in case that position changes.
The impact of an accelerated state pension age increase to 68 would depend on the timing of that rise.
If the increase to 68 is brought forward by seven years to 2037-39 – a proposal previously set out by the Government in 2017 – this could mean:
– Anyone born on or before 5 April 1970 would have a state pension age of 67;
– Anyone born from 6 April 1970 – 5 April 1971 would have a state pension age between 67 and 68;
– Anyone born from 6 April 1971 onwards would have a state pension age of 68.
If the increase to 68 is brought forward to 2035-37, this could mean:
– Anyone born on or before 5 April 1968 would have a state pension age of 67;
– Anyone born from 6 April 1968 to 5 April 1969 would have a state pension age between 67 and 68;
– Anyone born from 6 April 1969 onwards would have a state pension age of 68.
If the Government goes for the nuclear option and the increase to 68 is brought forward to 2033-35, this could mean:
– Anyone born on or before 5 April 1966 would have a state pension age of 67;
– Anyone born from 6 April 1966 to 5 April 1967 would have a state pension age between 67 and 68;
– Anyone born from 6 April 1967 onwards would have a state pension age of 68;
But it’s important to note none of this is set in stone yet. Once the Government sets out detailed plans, we’ll make sure you know exactly what will happen and how you might be affected.
DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION ON RETIREMENT ISSUES?
Send an email to asktom@sharesmagazine.co.uk with the words ‘Retirement question’ in the subject line. We’ll do our best to respond in a future edition of Shares.
Please note, we only provide information and we do not provide financial advice. If you’re unsure please consult a suitably qualified financial adviser. We cannot comment on individual investment portfolios.
Important information:
These articles are provided by Shares magazine which is published by AJ Bell Media, a part of AJ Bell. Shares is not written by AJ Bell.
Shares is provided for your general information and use and is not a personal recommendation to invest. It is not intended to be relied upon by you in making or not making any investment decisions. The investments referred to in these articles will not be suitable for all investors. If in doubt please seek appropriate independent financial advice.
Investors acting on the information in these articles do so at their own risk and AJ Bell Media and its staff do not accept liability for losses suffered by investors as a result of their investment decisions.
Issue contents
Feature
- Terry Smith reveals one of his biggest mistakes with Fundsmith Equity Fund
- China versus India: What you need to know before you invest
- Why bonds are back, how to invest in them and our best pick
- Does Royal Mail owner International Distributions Services hold a 'hidden store of value’?
- Paying the bills: How to get £1,500 post-tax monthly income in retirement
Great Ideas
News
- Why Caterpillar's results are better news for wider economy than itself
- Why Alphabet should be afraid of Microsoft’s $10 billion investment into ChatGPT
- New boss has his say as Rolls-Royce stages big share price recovery
- Weakness in the chip industry could spell trouble for the whole tech sector
- Why British American Tobacco has run out of puff