Archived article
Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.
Indivior's surprise $290 million provision highlights litigation risks

Indivior £15.99
Loss to date: 6.8%
Consistent upgrades to earnings from both the company and analysts resulting from strong growth in OUD (opioid use disorder) treatment Sublocade prompted us to turn positive on Indivior (INDV) in November 2022.
We argued the shares looked too cheap against the growth potential of the business but caveated the positive narrative because of the potential for adverse legacy litigation.
Both scenarios seem to be playing out at the same time after a recent trading update (16 February) showed better than expected growth, but also an unexpected $290 million exceptional provision related to legacy multi-district litigation cases.
WHAT HAS HAPPENED SINCE WE SAID TO BUY?
The shares have dropped around 15% since the trading update which saw the company fall into a full year net loss of $183 million.
The company said initial mediation meetings in late January 2023 provided new information on the ‘previously disclosed contingent liability’.
The provision is the board’s best guess and Indivior was keen to point out the final aggregate costs may be ‘materially’ different from the provision set aside.
This casts a shadow over what were otherwise positive strategic developments. Peak sales from Sublocade are expected reach more than $1.5 billion while sales of extended-release schizophrenia drug Perseris are expected to reach peak sales of between $200 million to $300 million.
The company also confirmed plans for a secondary US listing on Nasdaq which is expected to happen in the spring.
Indivior ended 2022 with cash and investments of $991 million, slightly down from $1.1 billion in the prior year after completing a second $100 million share repurchase programme which resulted in the company cancelling around 3% of its outstanding shares.
WHAT SHOULD INVESTORS DO NOW?
Although we recognised litigation as a risk, we did not expect the magnitude of the latest provision on top of the $607 million Department of Justice settlement agreed in 2020.
It seems to us an impossible task to assess the reasonable likelihood of ‘new information’ cropping up on legal cases which turn contingent liabilities into future provisions. We think it would be prudent to cut our losses now.
Important information:
These articles are provided by Shares magazine which is published by AJ Bell Media, a part of AJ Bell. Shares is not written by AJ Bell.
Shares is provided for your general information and use and is not a personal recommendation to invest. It is not intended to be relied upon by you in making or not making any investment decisions. The investments referred to in these articles will not be suitable for all investors. If in doubt please seek appropriate independent financial advice.
Investors acting on the information in these articles do so at their own risk and AJ Bell Media and its staff do not accept liability for losses suffered by investors as a result of their investment decisions.
Issue contents
Editor's View
Feature
- Revealing the bargain stocks which may have been left behind
- Time to invest in the UK: funds to play a resurgent stock market
- Discover the funds and stocks which pay monthly and quarterly incomes
- The £5 investment challenge. Get on board and invest a little bit more each month
- Emerging markets: a cold winter for China and growth back in favour
- Discover the emerging markets stocks picked out as growth champions
Great Ideas
News
- Big banks fail to live up to the market’s high expectations
- How US retail titans Walmart and Home Depot disappointed investors
- Darktrace calls in EY as it mounts fight against big fraud claims
- Why billionaire Ken Griffin is backing the Boohoo recovery plan
- LADbible owner LBG Media more than doubles after strong trading and broker optimism
- Trainline shares down 30% in six months with recovery derailed by strikes