Archived article
Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.
Japan’s public pension fund bans short-selling on ESG grounds

AJ Bell is an easy to use, award-winning platform Open an account
We've accounts to suit every investing need, and free guides and special offers to help you get the most from them.
You can get a few handy suggestions, or even get our experts to do the hard work for you – by picking one of our simple investment ideas.
All the resources you need to choose your shares, from market data to the latest investment news and analysis.
Funds offer an easier way to build your portfolio – we’ve got everything you need to choose the right one.
Starting to save for a pension, approaching retirement, or after an explainer on pension jargon? We can help.
Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.
Japan’s public pension fund GPIF, the largest in the world with $733bn of assets, will no longer allow shares to be loaned out from its global equity portfolio according to the Financial Times.
Hedge funds and other investors who engage in ‘short selling’, betting that shares will fall, need to ‘borrow’ shares before initiating their sell trades.
GPIF is thought to be seeking to establish its credentials as an environmental, social and governance (ESG) focused investor. The concern that led to the ban was that lending out stocks prevented the fund from conducting proper stewardship over its underlying investments.
That’s because there is a lack of transparency on the borrower and how they used the borrowed shares. When a stock is lent out, the voting rights are transferred to the borrower, which means the asset owner loses its direct engagement with the company.
The decision doesn’t come without a cost because according to the fund’s 2018 annual report it garnered $300m in fees from stock lending.
Although there is a chance that other asset managers will feel obliged to follow GPIF’s lead and ban short-selling on ESG grounds there are some potential fixes. For example, a fund could include a provision whereby the stock has to be returned for voting purposes.
These articles are provided by Shares magazine which is published by AJ Bell Media, a part of AJ Bell. Shares is not written by AJ Bell.
Shares is provided for your general information and use and is not a personal recommendation to invest. It is not intended to be relied upon by you in making or not making any investment decisions. The investments referred to in these articles will not be suitable for all investors. If in doubt please seek appropriate independent financial advice.
Investors acting on the information in these articles do so at their own risk and AJ Bell Media and its staff do not accept liability for losses suffered by investors as a result of their investment decisions.
The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you originally invested. We don't offer advice, so it's important you understand the risks, if you're unsure please consult a suitably qualified financial adviser. Tax treatment depends on your individual circumstances and rules may change. Past performance is not a guide to future performance and some investments need to be held for the long term.