Archived article
Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.
ESG-principled investors abandon Boohoo

AJ Bell is an easy to use, award-winning platform Open an account
We've accounts to suit every investing need, and free guides and special offers to help you get the most from them.
You can get a few handy suggestions, or even get our experts to do the hard work for you – by picking one of our simple investment ideas.
All the resources you need to choose your shares, from market data to the latest investment news and analysis.
Funds offer an easier way to build your portfolio – we’ve got everything you need to choose the right one.
Starting to save for a pension, approaching retirement, or after an explainer on pension jargon? We can help.
Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.
Shares in online fashion purveyor Boohoo (BOO:AIM) have plunged 45% from recent record highs to 230p following allegations of modern day slavery in supplier factories in Leicester. The negative backlash suggests that ESG-principled investors are turning their back on the company and that the shares have further to fall.
Boohoo has started a review of its supply chain and is seeking to hire two non-executive directors with experience in handling ESG issues. However, investors are worried about a brand backlash as the likes of Next (NXT) and ASOS (ASC:AIM) stop selling Boohoo’s clothes and social media influencers turn against the company.
Analysts worry that as many of the younger shoppers who form Boohoo’s core customer demographic have a sharp interest in business ethics, labour practices and sustainability, the
latest issues around suppliers might be damaging the brand.
Boohoo’s ‘test and repeat’ fast fashion model sees it sell products which shoppers typically wear once, then discard, which is yet another negative from an ESG perspective given the waste it creates.
The company has also attracted criticism over corporate governance practices such as an incentive scheme that would see directors share £150 million based only on share price performance and with no shareholder vote.
These articles are provided by Shares magazine which is published by AJ Bell Media, a part of AJ Bell. Shares is not written by AJ Bell.
Shares is provided for your general information and use and is not a personal recommendation to invest. It is not intended to be relied upon by you in making or not making any investment decisions. The investments referred to in these articles will not be suitable for all investors. If in doubt please seek appropriate independent financial advice.
Investors acting on the information in these articles do so at their own risk and AJ Bell Media and its staff do not accept liability for losses suffered by investors as a result of their investment decisions.
The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you originally invested. We don't offer advice, so it's important you understand the risks, if you're unsure please consult a suitably qualified financial adviser. Tax treatment depends on your individual circumstances and rules may change. Past performance is not a guide to future performance and some investments need to be held for the long term.