Archived article
Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.
FirstGroup sees off boardroom coup attempt

AJ Bell is an easy to use, award-winning platform Open an account
We've accounts to suit every investing need, and free guides and special offers to help you get the most from them.
You can get a few handy suggestions, or even get our experts to do the hard work for you – by picking one of our simple investment ideas.
All the resources you need to choose your shares, from market data to the latest investment news and analysis.
Funds offer an easier way to build your portfolio – we’ve got everything you need to choose the right one.
Starting to save for a pension, approaching retirement, or after an explainer on pension jargon? We can help.
Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.
Billed as an existential dust-up between transport operator FirstGroup (FGP) and its biggest shareholder Coast Capital, it is the former who has won after seeing off an attempt by the activist investor to remove six of its directors.
The Wall Street hedge fund couldn’t get the backing from 50% of voting shareholders that it needed in an extraordinary general meeting, despite reports that other top investors would vote in favour.
Coast had called for the removal of chairman Wolfhart Hauser and chief executive Matthew Gregory as well as four other of the 11 directors on the board.
Hauser’s days could still be numbered after nearly 30% voted for his removal. Historically bosses with such votes against them have been pressured into resigning.
Coast and FirstGroup clashed over the company’s strategy. Coast wants FirstGroup to get out of the troublesome rail sector and sell off its highly profitable American school bus division.
But FirstGroup would rather sell off the less profitable parts, like its coach service Greyhound, and argues the company’s pension deficit would soar if it sold off the best bits.
These articles are provided by Shares magazine which is published by AJ Bell Media, a part of AJ Bell. Shares is not written by AJ Bell.
Shares is provided for your general information and use and is not a personal recommendation to invest. It is not intended to be relied upon by you in making or not making any investment decisions. The investments referred to in these articles will not be suitable for all investors. If in doubt please seek appropriate independent financial advice.
Investors acting on the information in these articles do so at their own risk and AJ Bell Media and its staff do not accept liability for losses suffered by investors as a result of their investment decisions.
The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you originally invested. We don't offer advice, so it's important you understand the risks, if you're unsure please consult a suitably qualified financial adviser. Tax treatment depends on your individual circumstances and rules may change. Past performance is not a guide to future performance and some investments need to be held for the long term.
Our website uses cookies to give you a better browsing experience.
You can choose to accept all cookies, or control which we use by clicking 'Manage cookies'. To learn more, read our cookie policy.